Compare ยท SEO and audit suites
SiteAssay vs Sitechecker
Sitechecker is built around a good idea: an audit is a moment, and what an agency actually wants is to know when something breaks. It watches the sites on your list. It does not have an opinion about who should be on the list.
In one line
Sitechecker monitors the sites you already care about. SiteAssay works out which sites you should care about next.
What Sitechecker does better
- Continuous change monitoring across a portfolio of sites
- Crawl scheduling and alerting for sites you are contractually responsible for
- Tracking a single site over a long period in detail
Published pricing: Published in the region of $49/mo to $399/mo. Sources conflict on the tier detail, so treat this as approximate.
Sitechecker alternative: when it is the right call
Monitoring is a retention tool. It does exactly nothing for acquisition, and acquisition is what an agency runs out of first.
Capability by capability
Every entry in the Sitechecker column is taken from their own published pricing and feature pages on the date at the foot of this page. Where something is not part of their product, the row says that rather than implying it.
| Capability | SiteAssay | Sitechecker |
|---|---|---|
| Finds businesses that are not already your clients | Search a trade and a city, and every result is audited | You supply the domain |
| Change monitoring and re-audit alerts | Scheduled re-audits with a diff of what moved | Yes, this is the core of the product |
| Checks beyond SEO and performance | Deliverability, security exposure, accessibility, AI visibility | Focused on crawl, SEO and uptime |
| Says what it could not measure | A check that fails to run is reported as not run, never as a pass | Not a documented behaviour |
| Report a business owner can read | Shareable link and PDF, in your branding, written for a non-technical reader | A dashboard and an export |
| Contact details for the business | Found alongside the audit, from published sources | Not in scope |
| Outreach drafted from the findings | Drafted from the report, held for a person to approve | Not in scope |
| Priced on | Searches and audits | Sites monitored and pages crawled |
Questions this raises
Does SiteAssay monitor sites over time?
Yes. Sites can be re-audited on a schedule and each run produces a diff of what changed since the last one, which is what turns a one-off report into a reason to send a second email. Sitechecker goes deeper on crawl-level monitoring; we go wider on what is checked each time.
Which is the better Sitechecker alternative for an agency?
If you monitor sites you are paid to look after, stay where you are. If you want the monitoring to double as a prospecting engine, the difference is that our audits start from a search rather than from a list you typed in.
Also compared
About these comparisons
Checked against their published pages on .
Product names and trademarks belong to their respective owners and are used here for identification only. Every figure in the right-hand column comes from that product's own published pricing and feature pages on the date shown, and may have changed since. If something here is out of date, tell us and we will correct it.
Tell us about a correctionThe fastest way to settle this
Point the free audit at a site you already know is in poor shape, and see whether the report is one you would send to its owner.